<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Sitemaps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bustercollings.com/blog/2005/06/03/google-sitemaps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bustercollings.com/blog/2005/06/03/google-sitemaps/</link>
	<description>the official blog for Buster Collings (not Buster Collins)</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: buster</title>
		<link>http://www.bustercollings.com/blog/2005/06/03/google-sitemaps/#comment-1672</link>
		<dc:creator>buster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 16:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustercollings.com/blog/2005/06/03/google-sitemaps/#comment-1672</guid>
		<description>yeah i haven’t looked into it too much… but i think the benefit is more for smaller sites (which happen to use funky url’s with querystrings) that don’t know how to properly optimize their site’s url’s. but i’ll be keeping an eye on it… cause if there becomes a bonus for using it then u know it will soon become a very big topic of discussion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah i haven’t looked into it too much… but i think the benefit is more for smaller sites (which happen to use funky url’s with querystrings) that don’t know how to properly optimize their site’s url’s. but i’ll be keeping an eye on it… cause if there becomes a bonus for using it then u know it will soon become a very big topic of discussion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dubz</title>
		<link>http://www.bustercollings.com/blog/2005/06/03/google-sitemaps/#comment-1671</link>
		<dc:creator>Dubz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 16:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustercollings.com/blog/2005/06/03/google-sitemaps/#comment-1671</guid>
		<description>saw that, and thought...  why should I have to do the work! haha

its good that they have a format that you have to stick with - maybe it could be incorporated into a site when its built... but going back and having to put old websites in sitemap format might be crappy to have to do.

Check your Gmail Buster.

Dubz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>saw that, and thought&#8230;  why should I have to do the work! haha</p>
<p>its good that they have a format that you have to stick with - maybe it could be incorporated into a site when its built&#8230; but going back and having to put old websites in sitemap format might be crappy to have to do.</p>
<p>Check your Gmail Buster.</p>
<p>Dubz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
