Microsoft Virtual Earth is lame

compared to Google Maps (with satellite imagery) Microsoft’s MSN Virtual Earth >> http://virtualearth.msn.com/ is pretty much WEAK.

but hey… give M$ time… they got cash and always like to be second with an idea but first in the marketplace.

supposedly Yahoo! is going to release a similar product too. i’m sure that won’t be covered up in banner ads << sarcasm.

Bookmark and Share
This entry was written by Buster, posted on 7/25/2005 at 10:53 am, filed under General. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Comments are closed, but you can leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

7 Comments

  1. Dubz
    Posted 7/25/2005 at 11:15 am | Permalink

    I have to agree… tis lame-o. for now anyways…

    Dubz

  2. Casey
    Posted 7/26/2005 at 7:48 am | Permalink

    Yep, ditto here. Pretty lame. The sattelite images are horrible, at least for my area, compared to g’s.

    Oh, and thanks for pointing out that sarcasm. Almost missed it <

  3. Casey
    Posted 7/26/2005 at 7:49 am | Permalink

    Yep, ditto here. Pretty lame. The sattelite images are horrible, at least for my area, compared to g’s.

  4. Casey
    Posted 7/26/2005 at 7:57 am | Permalink

    Sorry for the near duplicate post, but I got a bunch of MySQL/PHP errors when I submitted. Got it on both posts, but I guess it still submitted my post.

  5. buster
    Posted 7/26/2005 at 12:59 pm | Permalink

    casey… no prob… thanks for mentioning the errors.. i wonder what that was about.

    and yes when discussing Yahoo! don’t you almost always have to explicitly mention when you are using sarcasm and when you are not?? :D

  6. Casey
    Posted 7/27/2005 at 1:17 pm | Permalink

    Ha, yeah, especially when mentioning Yahoo! and NOT having banner ads in the same sentence. :)

  7. theMaab
    Posted 8/11/2005 at 3:03 pm | Permalink

    They need to just take this down… turn it off… scrap it.