<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Buster Collings &#187; Search Engines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bustercollings.com/blog/topics/computers-internet/search-engines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bustercollings.com/blog</link>
	<description>the official blog for Buster Collings (not Buster Collins)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:33:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google can crawl Javascript</title>
		<link>http://www.bustercollings.com/blog/2009/06/08/google-can-crawl-javascript/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bustercollings.com/blog/2009/06/08/google-can-crawl-javascript/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 21:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Buster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business & Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers & Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustercollings.com/blog/?p=438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Micro$oft might be spending $100,000,000 dollars to convince you that they have developed a better search engine than Google, but Google&#8217;s I/O conference stirred up some conversations about the ability of Googlebot to crawl JavaScript. That&#8217;s a tremendous step forward for search engines. If it&#8217;s true it&#8217;s also a serious game changing feature; one that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Micro$oft might be spending $100,000,000 dollars to convince you that they have developed a better search engine than Google, but Google&#8217;s I/O conference stirred up some conversations about the ability of Googlebot to crawl JavaScript. That&#8217;s a tremendous step forward for search engines. If it&#8217;s true it&#8217;s also a serious game changing feature; one that should shush those (like myself) who&#8217;ve been saying that Google has been neglecting it&#8217;s search engine and focusing too much on all the other stuff they&#8217;ve been building, buying and giving away. So, it seems that yes Google can and does crawl JavaScript.</p>
<p>Here are some articles that SEO experts should check out.. and you&#8217;ll get a whiff of how important JavaScript crawling is:</p>
<p><a href="http://searchengineland.com/google-io-new-advances-in-the-searchability-of-javascript-and-flash-but-is-it-enough-19881" target="_blank">http://searchengineland.com/google-io-new-advances-in-the-searchability-of-javascript-and-flash-but-is-it-enough-19881</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/no-clarification-forthcoming-from-google-on-nofollow-pagerank-flow" target="_blank">http://www.seomoz.org/blog/no-clarification-forthcoming-from-google-on-nofollow-pagerank-flow</a></p>
<p><a href="http://searchengineland.com/google-loses-backwards-compatibility-on-paid-link-blocking-pagerank-sculpting-20408" target="_blank">http://searchengineland.com/google-loses-backwards-compatibility-on-paid-link-blocking-pagerank-sculpting-20408</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bustercollings.com/blog/2009/06/08/google-can-crawl-javascript/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Lengthens Snippets, But The Meta Description Still Important</title>
		<link>http://www.bustercollings.com/blog/2009/03/25/google-lengthens-snippets-but-the-meta-description-still-important/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bustercollings.com/blog/2009/03/25/google-lengthens-snippets-but-the-meta-description-still-important/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Buster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers & Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustercollings.com/blog/?p=389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So recently Google officially released longer snippets on search results. There has been some chatter about this depreciating the value of the meta description. I have to play spoiler here and say I disagree. The extended snippet stuff is great for long tail queries, like the many that I do when looking for programming information. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So recently Google officially released <a href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/03/google-rolls-out-longer-snippets-and-new-search-refinements.html" target="_blank">longer snippets</a> on search results. There has been some chatter about this depreciating the value of the meta description. I have to play spoiler here and say I disagree.</p>
<p>The extended snippet stuff is great for long tail queries, like the many that I do when looking for programming information. Yet I don’t think it changes the importance of the meta description tag, especially for shorter search phrases.</p>
<p>Short snippets indicate tighter keyword proximity within the optimization of content; more precisely what the searcher is looking for. Longer snippets are only displayed when the keyword proximity is wider, therefore the content might not be precisely what the search is looking for, so that the searcher can better determine if the content on each page might have what they’re searching for.</p>
<p>Here’s some examples of tight keyword proximity within the content of the ranked pages, resulting in mostly short snippets:</p>
<p>“<a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;rlz=1W1GGLL_en&#038;q=asp.net+response.cookie+expiration" target="_blank">asp.net response.cookie expiration</a>”</p>
<p>“<a href="http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;rlz=1T4GGLL_enUS306US306&#038;q=austin+rodeo+tickets" target="_blank">Austin rodeo tickets</a>”</p>
<p>Here’s some examples of loose keyword proximity within the content of the ranked pages, resulting in many long snippets:</p>
<p>“<a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;rlz=1W1GGLL_en&#038;q=asp.net+response.cookie+expiration+not+working" target="_blank">asp.net response.cookie expiration not working</a>”</p>
<p>“<a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;rlz=1T4GGLL_enUS306US306&#038;q=can+i+watch+the+austin+rodeo+on+tv" target="_blank">can i watch the austin rodeo on tv</a>”</p>
<p>So I stand by my opinion that body content and title tag are equally the best places to optimize for keywords and phrases to increase rankings, while <strong>the meta description is the best place to encourage a click</strong> through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bustercollings.com/blog/2009/03/25/google-lengthens-snippets-but-the-meta-description-still-important/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unlcaimed Money in Texas</title>
		<link>http://www.bustercollings.com/blog/2007/10/23/unlcaimed-money-in-texas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bustercollings.com/blog/2007/10/23/unlcaimed-money-in-texas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Buster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Freeware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustercollings.com/blog/2007/10/23/unlcaimed-money-in-texas/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Texans, can you imagine being entitled to money or property that you aren&#8217;t even aware of&#8230; a friend, a family member or perhaps even you might have unclaimed money in Texas just waiting for you to claim it. it might be 2 dollars&#8230; or it might be 200 bucks or&#8230; well you can dream can&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texans, can you imagine being entitled to money or property that you aren&#8217;t even aware of&#8230; a friend, a family member or perhaps even you might have unclaimed money in Texas just waiting for you to claim it. it might be 2 dollars&#8230; or it might be 200 bucks or&#8230; well you can dream can&#8217;t you.. haha.</p>
<p>anyhow, i&#8217;ve never been one to scan through the long fine printed lists of names that the newspapers release from time to time&#8230; but my mom was telling me just yesterday that she got on to the Unclaimed Property Website of Texas and found money that cousin and stepfather owed. my cousins came from accounts her father had left behind, that nobody was aware of&#8230; and my stepdad had some money from an old job and some sort of credit account. nice! sadly nothing for me&#8230; sniffle sniffle. o yeah my mom also found a few hundred dollars that was owed to one of her friends&#8230; now that&#8217;s a good friend.</p>
<p>anyhow the website, unlike the unclaimed money lists that newspapers publish, is quick and easy to explore.</p>
<p>so, i suggest you at least spend a few minutes scanning cities and last names of your friends and family memebers and most importantly yourself <img src='http://www.bustercollings.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Find unclaimed money in Texas >>  <a href="https://txcpa.cpa.state.tx.us/up/Search.jsp" target="_blank">https://txcpa.cpa.state.tx.us/up/Search.jsp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bustercollings.com/blog/2007/10/23/unlcaimed-money-in-texas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Maps &#8211; My Maps</title>
		<link>http://www.bustercollings.com/blog/2007/04/05/google-maps-my-maps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bustercollings.com/blog/2007/04/05/google-maps-my-maps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 20:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Buster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Freeware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustercollings.com/blog/2007/04/05/google-maps-my-maps/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[google maps just got a lot cooler&#8230; imagine that. now you can create and share you&#8217;re own custom maps. this is going to be great for giving somebody custom directions. developers with the know-how should be able to integrate custom maps onto their site pretty easily. thanks again G! take a test drive&#8230; here is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>google maps just got a lot cooler&#8230; imagine that. now you can create and share you&#8217;re own custom maps. this is going to be great for giving somebody custom directions. developers with the know-how should be able to integrate custom maps onto their site pretty easily. thanks again G!</p>
<p>take a test drive&#8230; here is a super cheesy map of >> <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&#038;hl=en&#038;msa=0&#038;msid=113012890554822323977.00000111c36420c856743&#038;om=1&#038;z=13&#038;ll=30.4056,-97.689915&#038;spn=0.105561,0.159645" target="_blank">my moring drive to work</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bustercollings.com/blog/2007/04/05/google-maps-my-maps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.bustercollings.com/blog/topics/computers-internet/search-engines/feed/ ) in 0.63164 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 7:44 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 11th, 2012 at 8:44 pm UTC -->
